Skip to content

Deal with the origins of meat contamination

Dear Editor According to Canada Press, and other media sources, the Canadian Cattlemen's Association wants the federal government to approve the irradiation of beef, supposedly to kill dangerous E. coli.

Dear Editor

According to Canada Press, and other media sources, the Canadian Cattlemen's Association wants the federal government to approve the irradiation of beef, supposedly to kill dangerous E. coli. Irradiation is a process by which a food product is exposed to high doses of radiation to kill bacteria, parasites, and mould. In the United Sates, three types of ionizing radiation are permitted: gamma rays, high-energy electrons and x-rays. I am told that both x-rays and gamma rays involve high energy photons that, when they strike a molecule, can disrupt that molecule. All kinds of other molecules can be created that may or may not be harmful. However, sometimes all it takes is one harmful molecule to randomly cause a cancer.

Doug O'Halloran, president of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 401, says the processing line at the XL Foods Lakeside plant in Brooks, Alta. moves too quickly. Between 300 and 320 carcasses go by workers every hour and employees make between 3,000 and 4,000 cuts a shift that has resulted in considerably less time in which to make sure knives are sanitized after each cut.

Cattle are supposed to be washed before they enter to ensure their fur is free of manure, but sometimes the water is not hot enough to remove all the excrement, resulting in that excrement backing up on the killing floor forcing workers to traipse through the waste and track it through the plant.

Dr. Patricia Whisnant, a graduate of the University of Tennessee College Of Veterinary Medicine (1981) states "60 per cent of the largest United States meat plants failed to meet federal food safety regulations for preventing E. Coli bacteria in their products." What are the statistics in Canada?

As Whisnant states "Irradiation may provide an excuse not to tackle the real sources and practices responsible for the contamination of beef mainly the filth in the confined environment of the feedlot and the fecal contamination that occurs in the high speed slaughter facility." As Whisnant further states "Our efforts in the meat industry should be aimed at removing the filth from the source, not just making cow manure safer to eat " (Clean Beef or irradiated Dirty Beef? A Veterinarian's Perspective)

While the CCA says its proposal calls for irradiated beef to be clearly labelled, irradiation is just a band-aid on the problem. It is better to deal with the origins of the problem and not irradiate at all.

Joyce Neufeld

Waldeck

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks